![]() By comparison, it took me only about five minutes to enter the same data in the most efficient program, Family Historian, but close to 12 minutes in most of the programs I tested. I entered the data for 10 individuals in a total of less than eight minutes. Overall, the data entry process is efficient. That said, the floating tabs are a bit too subtle, making it a little more difficult to figure out there are floating tabs to work in. The well-crafted interface uses a mostly modeless design. The navigation received a B+ and the data entry received an A– for ease of use. If there’s an issue with a relationship early in the pedigree chart, such as a same-sex marriage, the subsequent relationships all must be re-established. In fact, the RootsMagic interpreted the fourth file exactly as Ancestral Quest did, getting all the individual information correct but losing the relationships. The fourth record, however, was full of errors. ![]() I imported four GEDCOM records to test the program, and it was almost perfectly accurate on three of the records, losing a handful of media files. It’s important to retain the original trees in Ancestry for problem-solving. ![]() That has significantly reduced the value of having a tree on the Ancestry website Fixing The Simpler RootsMagic Issues In Your Merged Ancestry Tree. RootsMagic earned a B on the GEDCOM accuracy test. RootsMagic is treating the Ancestry record as an external source. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |